Esto es lo que están
consiguiendo… Y es malo para el futuro.
There has been a lot of angst lately over
the rise in interest rates and the question of whether the government will be
able to continue to fund itself given the massive surge in the fiscal deficit
since the beginning of the year.
While “spending like drunken sailors” is not a long-term solution to
creating economic stability, unbridled fiscal stimulus does support growth in
the short-term. Spending
on natural disaster recovery last year (3-major
hurricanes and two wildfires) led to a pop in Q2 and Q3
economic growth rates. The two recent hurricanes that slammed into South
Carolina and Florida were big enough to sustain a bump in activity into early
2019. However, all that activity is simply “pulling forward” future
growth.
But the most recent cause of concern
behind the rise in interest rates is that there will be a “funding shortage” of
U.S. debt at a time where governmental obligations are surging higher. I agree
with Kevin Muir on this point who recently noted:
“Well, let me you in on a little secret.
The US will have NO trouble funding itself. That’s not what’s going on.
If the bond market was truly worried about
US government’s deficits, they would be monkey-hammering the long-end of the
bond market. Yet the US 2-year note yields 2.88% while the 30-year bond is only
55 basis points higher at 3.43%. That’s not a yield curve worried about US
fiscal situation.
And let’s face it, if Japan can maintain
control of their bond market with their bat-shit-crazy debt-to-GDP level of
236%, the US will be just fine for quite some time.”
That’s not a good thing by the way.
Let’s Be Like Japan
“Bad debt is the root of the crisis.
Fiscal stimulus may help economies for a couple of years but once the
‘painkilling’ effect wears off, U.S. and European economies will plunge back
into crisis. The crisis won’t be over until the nonperforming assets are off
the balance sheets of US and European banks.” – Keiichiro Kobayashi, 2010
While Kobayashi will ultimately be right,
what he never envisioned was the extent to which Central Banks globally would
be willing to go. As my partner Michael Lebowitz pointed out previously:
“Global central banks’ post-financial
crisis monetary policies have collectively been more aggressive than anything
witnessed in modern financial history. Over the last ten years, the six largest central banks have printed
unprecedented amounts of money to purchase approximately $14 trillion of
financial assets as shown below. Before the financial crisis of 2008, the only
central bank printing money of any consequence was the Peoples Bank of China
(PBoC).”
The belief was that by driving asset
prices higher, economic growth would follow. Unfortunately, this has yet to be
the case as debt both globally and specifically in the U.S. has exploded.
“QE has forced interest rates downward and
lowered interest expenses for all debtors. Simultaneously, it boosted the
amount of outstanding debt. The net effect is that the global debt burden has
grown on a nominal basis and as a percentage of economic growth since 2008. The
debt burden has become even more burdensome.”
Not surprisingly, the massive surge in
debt has led to an explosion in the financial markets as cheap debt and
leverage fueled a speculative frenzy in virtually every asset class.
The continuing mounting of debt from both
the public and private sector, combined with rising health care costs,
particularly for aging “baby
boomers,” are among the factors behind soaring US debt. While “tax reform,” in a “vacuum” should boost rates of
consumption and, ultimately, economic growth, the economic drag of poor
demographics and soaring costs, will offset many of the benefits.
The complexity of the current environment
implies years of sub-par economic growth ahead as noted by the Fed last week as
their long-term projections, along with the CBO, remain mired at 2%.
The US is not the only country facing such
a gloomy outlook for public finances, but the current economic overlay
displays compelling similarities with Japan in the 1990s.
Also, while it is believed that “tax reform” will
fix the problem of lackluster wage growth, create more jobs, and boost economic
prosperity, one should at least question the logic given that more expansive spending, as
represented in the chart above by the surge in debt, is having no
substantial lasting impact on economic growth. As I have
written previously, debt is a retardant to organic economic growth as it
diverts dollars from productive investment to debt service.
One only needs to look at Japan for an
understanding that QE, low-interest rate policies, and expansion of debt have done little economically. Take
a look at the chart below which shows the expansion of the BOJ assets versus
the growth of GDP and levels of interest rates.
Notice that since 1998, Japan has not
achieved a 2% rate of economic growth. Even with interest rates still near zero,
economic growth remains mired below one-percent, providing little evidence
to support the idea that inflating asset prices by buying assets leads to
stronger economic outcomes.
But yet, the current Administration
believes our outcome will be different.
With the current economic recovery already
pushing the long end of the economic cycle, the risk is rising that the next
economic downturn is closer than not. The danger is that the Federal Reserve is now
potentially trapped with an inability to use monetary policy tools to offset
the next economic decline when it occurs.
This is the same problem that Japan has
wrestled with for the last 25 years. While Japan has entered into an
unprecedented stimulus program (on
a relative basis twice as large as the U.S. on an economy 1/3 the size) there
is no guarantee that such a program will result in the desired effect of
pulling the Japanese economy out of its 30-year deflationary cycle. The problems that face Japan are
similar to what we are currently witnessing in the U.S.:
+A decline in savings rates to extremely low levels which
depletes productive investments
+An aging demographic that is top heavy and drawing on
social benefits at an advancing rate.
+A heavily indebted economy with debt/GDP ratios above 100%.
+A decline in exports due to a weak global economic
environment.
+Slowing domestic economic growth rates.
+An underemployed younger demographic.
+An inelastic supply-demand curve
+Weak industrial production
+Dependence on productivity increases to offset reduced employment
The lynchpin to Japan, and the U.S.,
remains demographics and interest rates. As the aging population grows
becoming a net drag on “savings,” the
dependency on the “social
welfare net” will continue to expand. The “pension
problem” is only the
tip of the iceberg.
If interest rates rise sharply it is
effectively “game
over” as
borrowing costs surge, deficits balloon, housing falls, revenues weaken and
consumer demand wanes. It
is the worst thing that can happen to an economy that is currently remaining on
life support.
Japan, like the U.S., is caught in an
on-going “liquidity
trap”
where maintaining ultra-low interest rates are the key to sustaining an
economic pulse. The
unintended consequence of such actions, as we are witnessing in the U.S.
currently, is the ongoing battle with deflationary pressures. The lower interest rates go – the
less economic return that can be generated. An ultra-low interest rate
environment, contrary to mainstream thought, has a negative impact on making
productive investments and risk begins to outweigh the potential return.
More importantly, while there are many
calling for an
end of the “Great
Bond Bull Market,” this
is unlikely the case for two reasons.
1.As shown in the chart below, interest rates are
relative globally. Rates can’t rise in one country while a majority of
global economies are pushing low to negative rates. As has been the case over the last
30-years, so goes Japan, so goes the U.S.
2.Increases in rates also kill economic
growth which drags rates lower. Like Japan, every time rates begin to rise, the
economy rolls into a recession. The U.S. will face the same
challenges.
Unfortunately, for the current
Administration, the reality is that cutting taxes, tariffs, and sharp increases
in debt, is unlikely to change the outcome in the U.S. The reason is simply that monetary
interventions, and government spending, don’t create organic, sustainable,
economic growth. Simply pulling forward future consumption
through monetary policy continues to leave an ever-growing void in the future
that must be filled. Eventually,
the void will be too great to fill.
But hey, let’s just keep doing the same
thing over and over again, which hasn’t worked for anyone as of yet, but we can
always hope for a different result.
What’s the worst that could happen?
Abrazos,
PD1: En nuestro mundo
consumista, tenemos tantas cosas que podemos caer en la tentación de creer que
nos otorgan seguridad, que nos sostiene una gran cuerda. Pero, en realidad,
igual que los “pobres”, estamos colgando de un hilo. Decía la Madre Teresa: «Dios
no puede llenar lo que está lleno de otras cosas». Tenemos el peligro de tener
a Dios como un elemento más en nuestra vida, un libro más en la biblioteca;
importante, sí, pero un libro más. Y, por tanto, no considerarlo en verdad como
nuestro Salvador.
